Framework · Doctrine v1.1.5
What this framework is — and is not
CPT aims to become capable of the laboratory measurements used to support the Standard Model and QED — and to provide equivalence to those numbers. It does not owe SM/QED ontology, and it is not a present replacement certificate.
What this framework is — and is not
CPT aims to become capable of the laboratory measurements used to support the Standard Model and QED — and to provide equivalence to those numbers. It does not owe SM/QED ontology, and it is not a present replacement certificate.
What it represents
A working one-force programme
One electrodynamic force programme plus matter rules (seats, windings, confinement on S³ / Clifford). Laboratory two-seat response is presently standard relativistic ED reconstructed on BQ point currents; it is not yet derived from a native bulk/seat action.
Equivalence to measurements
The particle / QED job is the laboratory numbers SM and QED cite as support: charges, moments, spectra, lifetimes, cross sections, form factors, and DIS scaling as measured.
An integrity-tagged lab
Claims are tagged [E] / [M] / [O] / [F]. Open residuals stay listed. Public chips flip only after human promote. “Should be capable of” is the target class, not a claim that this is already done.
What it does not
Not a finished TOE or QED certificate
α is INPUT (a leftover, not a 137-formula homework). Continuum hold is OPEN (one-seat); the local one-seat/thin-seat programme is parked, not closed. Free fine structure and Lamb are parked. Soft packages are not a completed UFT.
Not SM/QED ontology
Quarks, gluons, virtual photons, PDFs, and off-shell Feynman lines are bookkeeping / export labels — not CPT primitives.
Not a 3-quark photograph
A probe of an intact proton has not demonstrated three quarks. DIS scaling is consistent with a hard charged current plus a model. Probe (resolve a still-bound seat) is not smash (what whole seats exit).
Why
SM and QED are supported by measurements. Compatibility calculations that paste three quarks or virtual photons onto the geometry are catalogue, not ontology. The framework is honest when it aims at the data and refuses the extra story.
Two leftovers · seven frontiers
A 3-slice has two leftovers downstairs: one dimensionless electromagnetic coupling (α) and one length. {c, ℏ, ε₀, e} are SI clothes of those two. They are INPUT / access, not the same homework as the seven open frontiers.
Seven genuine physics frontiers: one-seat hold, hard bulk–face join, visibility, spin growth-rate, Foot δ/K/L, native heavy membership, and smash-fragment census if asked. Paper I/II submit is PARKED process, not an eighth frontier. α and local m_e are leftovers, not frontiers. Local hold programme parked; F1 chip stays OPEN.
Open frontiers and how to pitch in →In the measurement basket
- ·Measured charges and magnetic moments
- ·Spectra, masses, and lifetimes as numbers
- ·Elastic form factors of one seat
- ·Inclusive DIS scaling as measured
- ·Compton, Mott, pair production as observed
Not required ontology
- ·Virtual photons as objects
- ·Three quarks counted on a live proton
- ·Gluons / colour as primitives
- ·PDFs and DGLAP as required CPT machinery
- ·Off-shell Feynman lines
Recent honesty (lab → public)
Local hold programme parked
honestyThe local one-seat / thin-seat shop is parked, not closed. Public F1 stays OPEN. Hopfion / ACT existence is not H-D hold. Reopen only with a new independent length (L-NEW) or a transmutation named in L — not another field on leftover R.
One leftover length cannot mint a thin seat
honestyWith a single leftover length, scored soliton roots are O(1) in that length. A Compton-class thin tube is a hierarchy (open frontier F2), not a one-scale root. Dilaton, unfrozen g, and Einstein coupling do not mint a second length.
R_eff is not the electron S³
honestyThe Mach length R_eff ~ 3.3×10²⁶ m remains unnamed. It is not the electron’s 3-sphere (Compton / R_eff ~ 10⁻³⁹), not FLRW curvature, and not F2 L_*.
Quarks are lobe / channel labels
E metaNot free particles and not knot-diagram crossings. G₂ 3⊕3̄ is a flavour-slot column, not a count of sites on one nucleon.
No 3-quark photograph
honestyExperiment has not counted three quarks on a live proton. Structural lab reading: the T(2,3) proton seat has two internal lobes; the T(3,2) neutron seat has three. That is a discriminator versus QCD’s 3/3 — not a claimed laboratory photograph, and not a licence to add a third proton lobe.
A factor 2/3 is not one identity
honestyTwo lobes over three lobes is 2/3, and T(2,3) has p/q = 2/3. Neither derives the magnetic-moment ratio μ_n/μ_p = −2/3, which remains an SU(6) compatibility formula (magnitudes are inputs).
Virtual photons are not CPT objects
honestyA real probe is a free train times a seat. May DIS F₂ / r/R = 0.847 is not a free theorem.
Two leftovers downstairs
honestyOne dimensionless coupling (α) and one length. {c, ℏ, ε₀, e} are SI clothes. Hold is not an m_e factory. α = tan β is a reading, not a derivation of 1/137.
Seven open frontiers
honestyF1–F7 remain the genuine residuals. F1 chip OPEN, local hold programme parked. F2 remaining generator is L-NEW. Paper I/II submit is PARKED process, not F8. A 137-formula, a third proton lobe, or Darwin-as-hold is the wrong book.
Requirements spine complete; generative theory incomplete
maturitySAP requirements, typed arrows, scorecards, and stop conditions are explicit on the current skeleton. The native action, occupation, hold, formation, hard join, scale ontology, and a discriminating observable remain open.
Two leftovers · seven open frontiers
Seven genuine physics frontiers: one-seat hold, hard bulk–face join, visibility, spin growth-rate, Foot δ/K/L, native heavy membership, and smash-fragment census if asked. Paper I/II submit is PARKED process, not an eighth frontier. α and local m_e are leftovers, not frontiers. Local hold programme parked; F1 chip stays OPEN.
Leftovers — not frontiers
A 3-slice has two leftovers downstairs: one dimensionless electromagnetic coupling (α) and one length. {c, ℏ, ε₀, e} are SI clothes of those two. They are INPUT / access, not the same homework as the seven open frontiers.
Dimensionless EM coupling α
INPUTSlice-access on the present 3-algebra. α = tan β is a reading, not a derivation of 1/137. Not a 137-formula homework.
One length (a, or cosmic R if Mach)
INPUT / accessLocal m_e is blocked by homogeneity (Lemma L1). Compact-core Route A (hold → a → m_e) is FIRE as a mint. Soft P_EMC is glue, not a downstairs mint. One leftover length yields O(1) soliton roots only; a thin particle seat is a hierarchy (F2), not a one-scale root.
Genuine physics frontiers
F1One-seat continuum hold
OPENOne-seat packaging. Two-seat laboratory ED (Darwin / boosted Coulomb) does not close it. Local one-seat/thin-seat programme parked; chip stays OPEN.
Would not count: Maxwell recovery, dual cancel, Schott/Goedecke, Coulomb bunching, a two-body bench test, Hopfion/ACT as hold, or selling the parked local programme as hold closed.
F2Hard bulk–face E=mc² join
OPENIndependent geometric length a and inertial mass m. Soft P_EMC is glue [M], not the theorem. Remaining generator is L-NEW — not present R_eff, not an extra field on leftover R.
Would not count: Dual cancel, α-screening, R = r_e/2, present R_eff as L_*, or dilaton / unfrozen g / Einstein as a second-length mint.
F3Visibility / occupancy
OPENWhich lattice states are seen is a multi-body / sum-class question. Sister of α, not α.
Would not count: A knot invariant (gcd, writhe) selecting Hopf vs Free, merging this into a derivation of α, or a 2D occupancy rerun as a close.
F4Spin growth-rate / moment-arm
OPENThe form of the Regge tower is banked. The slope ratio ≈0.744 is not a missing geometric constant.
Would not count: Shopping another projection equal to 0.744, or treating 0.744 as tan β.
F5Foot δ and K/L first principles
OPENOne S⁷ residual with two named numbers. Licensed selectors on frozen R-HOPF are exhausted negatively; the residual remains OPEN and Route E μ/τ ratios are a different track.
Would not count: Two-channel doubling of Foot K/L, treating Route E as a derivation of δ, or selling an S⁷ involution / equator as a first-principles δ theorem.
F6Native heavy flavour membership
PARKEDWhich seats and scales match what SM calls charm / bottom / top. Not free c,b,t on e_i.
Would not count: e_5 = c, a unique CKM matrix, or a six-quark basis as derivation.
F7Smash-fragment census
OPEN if askedWhat whole seats exit a break-up. Probe ≠ smash. Not on-shell quarks.
Would not count: On-shell quarks as smash products, or mixing probe resolution into jet counts.
Open-frontier labels F1–F7 come from the lab shareable note. They are not the forbidden-list IDs F1–F21 (forbidden F1 is “hold closed”; open frontier F1 is “one-seat hold remains open”).
Longer list and how to pitch in: /validation/open-problems. Residual chips stay on /status.
Framework overview
Rather than treating particles as fundamental point objects, CPT proposes that measurable properties—mass, charge, spin—arise from the geometric and topological constraints of photon confinement. The framework investigates whether these constraints can yield computable values that reproduce experiment.
The implementation is dual-track: TypeScript as the primary computational environment, Python as a secondary implementation. Parity between the two is a validation criterion, not merely a convenience. Divergence between implementations is treated as a signal requiring investigation.
The framework is not presented as complete. Sections on this page clearly distinguish what has been validated internally from what remains under active investigation.
Core principles
Measurements, not extra ontology
The particle / QED job is the laboratory numbers used to support the Standard Model and QED. Quarks, gluons, and virtual photons are not required CPT objects. α remains an INPUT leftover; hold remains OPEN as one-seat packaging (local hold programme parked, not closed).
Seats, not point primitives
Matter is packaged as confined circulating seats (torus knots / Hopf fibres) on S³ / Clifford. A “quark” is an SM name for a lobe or channel of such a seat — not a free particle counted on a live proton.
Integrity tags are mandatory
Every public claim is [E], [M], [O], or [F]. Lab campaigns do not flip residual chips. Compatibility calculations stay catalogue until a human promote.
Staged disclosure
Results appear on this hub only after a promote gate. “Should be capable of” is the target class. It is not a certificate that QED or the SM has already been reproduced.
Established versus under investigation
Passed internal validation
- Integrity-tagged public doctrine: open residuals listed; α INPUT; hold OPEN (local programme parked)
- Electron as T(1,1) core-ready under named packages (not hold-closed)
- Route E Willmore ladder for μ/τ mass ratios versus data (coefficient origin open)
- Quark = SM lobe/channel label — not a CPT primitive; no 3-quark photograph
Open residuals (chips unflipped)
- F1 One-seat continuum hold — chip OPEN; local one-seat/thin-seat programme parked, not closed
- F2 Hard bulk–face E=mc² join — remaining generator is L-NEW, not present R_eff
- F3 Visibility / occupancy (multi-body; not α; not knot arithmetic; 2D occupancy scored not closed)
- F4 Spin growth-rate / moment-arm (0.744 is a ratio, not a constant to shop)
- F5 Foot δ and K/L first principles (one S⁷ residual; not a δ theorem)
- F6 Native heavy flavour membership (parked; not free c,b,t on e_i)
- F7 Smash-fragment census if asked (whole seats, not on-shell quarks)
Methods and assumptions
- Theoretical basis
- Geometric topology applied to photon confinement geometry. Properties are derived from topological invariants of the confinement boundary.
- Unit system
- Internally consistent SI-aligned system. Computed constants are compared against SI reference values as a validation criterion.
- Computational stack
- TypeScript (primary) and Python (secondary). Both implementations must produce consistent results within defined tolerance.
- Validation method
- Deterministic local test suites with automated release gating. Non-deterministic outputs are not accepted in this phase.
Frequently asked questions
Is CPT a TOE or a UFT?
CPT is a working one-force unified-field (UFT) framework — a documented, multi-domain alternative programme to multi-force SM+QG packaging, with open residuals listed. It is not a multi-force finished SM+QG TOE, and not a completed-UFT certificate. See /status.
Is CPT a replacement for the Standard Model?
CPT aims at SM- and gravity-equivalent phenomenology under one force and matter rules — meaning the laboratory measurements those theories are supported by, not their ontology. It is not a finished Lagrangian replacement. See /status.
Did experiment count three quarks in the proton?
No. A probe of an intact proton has not demonstrated three quarks. DIS scaling is consistent with a hard charged current plus a model. In this framework quarks are lobe/channel labels. Structural lab reading: two internal lobes on the proton seat, three on the neutron seat — a discriminator, not a photograph.
Does two proton lobes explain μ_n/μ_p = −2/3?
No. Two lobes over three is 2/3, and T(2,3) has p/q = 2/3. Neither derives the magnetic-moment ratio. That −2/3 remains an SU(6) compatibility formula; quark-moment magnitudes are inputs.
Are the theoretical claims peer-reviewed?
The framework has not undergone external peer review in this phase. Claims are scoped to what has passed internal validation. External review is a goal for a later development phase.
What domains does CPT currently cover?
The core implementation covers scalar topology, basic electrodynamics constants, and nuclear structure relationships at the core tier. The pro tier extends to vectorized APIs and the nuclear engine. Coverage claims are explicitly limited to validated results.
How does CPT handle the unit system?
Downstairs leftovers are one dimensionless coupling (α) and one length. {c, ℏ, ε₀, e} are SI clothes of those two. CPT uses an internally consistent SI-aligned packaging. α = tan β is a geometric reading, not a derivation of 1/137.
What are the open frontiers?
Seven genuine physics frontiers: one-seat hold, hard join, visibility, spin growth-rate, Foot δ/K/L, native heavy membership, and smash-fragment census if asked. Paper I submit is process, not an eighth frontier. Origin of α and local m_e are leftovers (INPUT / access), not frontiers. See /validation/open-problems.
Does laboratory electrodynamics close continuum hold?
No. Two-seat laboratory ED is Darwin / boosted Coulomb. Measurements are seat–seat. That is a different book from one-seat packaging. Dual cancel, Schott/Goedecke, and Maxwell recovery do not close hold.
When will the framework be publicly documented in full?
Full documentation is staged alongside the validation roadmap. Conceptual documentation expands as validation gates are cleared. See the Roadmap page for current phase.
Interested in the software that implements these principles?
View Software →