Research Library · Source Document

fl_heavy_selection_tower_results.md

Download raw
112 lines·~892 words·fl_heavy_selection_tower_results.md

This is a raw source document. Integrity tags [E] [M] [O] [F] are coloured for readability. Content is as written in the research file.

FL-HEAVY H4/H5: Selection Principle + Tower Test

Date: 2026-08-09 Script: scripts/investigations/s3_geometry/fl_heavy_selection_tower.py JSON: scripts/investigations/s3_geometry/data/fl_heavy_selection_tower.json Priors: fl_heavy_lattice_dual_seat_results.md · light 102 census features Tags: [E] · [E honesty] · [M] · [O] · [F]

0. Why H4

H3 produced empty Hopf seeds with competitive residuals. At heavy mass the lattice is dense, so many points fit. Selection is the non-vacuous residual. Light prior: Hopf gcd=1 fraction = 50/86 = 0.581.

1. H4 — Cloud uniqueness + rules

| Ground | cloud ≤2% | n ≤0.5% | n in 2×best | err2/err1 | empty∩comp | S0 seed | S2 gcd1 | S6 | |--------|----------:|--------:|------------:|----------:|-----------:|---------|---------|-----| | D | 25 | 3 | 4 | 1.13 | 2 | (12,24) 0.26% | (15,22) 0.51% | — | | Ds | 26 | 9 | 2 | 1.73 | 9 | (11,26) 0.07% | (11,26) 0.07% | (11,26) 0.07% | | Lc | 36 | 7 | 2 | 1.00 | 7 | (7,32) 0.04% | (7,32) 0.04% | (7,32) 0.04% | | Jpsi | 62 | 15 | 2 | 1.00 | 15 | (11,43) 0.00% | (11,43) 0.00% | (11,43) 0.00% | | etac | 60 | 10 | 1 | 2.15 | 10 | (8,42) 0.03% | (12,41) 0.12% | (12,41) 0.12% | | B | 185 | 42 | 3 | 1.00 | 42 | (10,75) 0.01% | (37,66) 0.01% | (37,66) 0.01% | | Bs | 189 | 46 | 2 | 1.00 | 46 | (21,74) 0.00% | (21,74) 0.00% | (21,74) 0.00% | | Lb | 209 | 45 | 3 | 1.00 | 45 | (34,73) 0.02% | (34,73) 0.02% | (34,73) 0.02% | | Upsilon | 589 | 149 | 4 | 1.00 | 149 | (31,132) 0.00% | (31,132) 0.00% | (31,132) 0.00% | S2 differs from S0: 3/9 S6 available (gcd1∩≤0.5%): 8/9 Grounds with >5 competitive points: 8/9 | Finding | Tag | |---------|-----| | Competitive clouds are large — best-err not unique | [E honesty] | | gcd=1 (light-like) re-seeds many grounds vs S0 | [E process] | | S6 = empty ∩ gcd=1 ∩ err≤0.5% preferred provisional package | [M] | | S6 = finished multiplet theorem | [F if claimed] |

Preferred provisional seed package (S6)

| Ground | S6 (w1,w2) | N | err% | empty | |--------|------------|--:|-----:|:-----:| | D | S2 fallback (15,22) | 709 | 0.507 | False | | Ds | (11,26) | 797 | 0.069 | True | | Lc | (7,32) | 1073 | 0.044 | True | | Jpsi | (11,43) | 1970 | 0.005 | True | | etac | (12,41) | 1825 | 0.117 | True | | B | (37,66) | 5725 | 0.009 | True | | Bs | (21,74) | 5917 | 0.001 | True | | Lb | (34,73) | 6485 | 0.017 | True | | Upsilon | (31,132) | 18385 | 0.001 | True |

2. H5 — Tower clustering

For each family, nearest Hopf point of each excitation vs ground S0/S6 seed and a wrong light seed (5,6). | Family | n | mean d(S0) | mean d(wrong) | frac closer to S0 than wrong | |--------|--:|-----------:|--------------:|-----------------------------:| | D | 12 | 11.4 | 28.8 | 1.00 | | B | 7 | 18.2 | 74.1 | 1.00 | | psi | 11 | 16.2 | 50.5 | 1.00 | | Upsilon | 8 | 24.2 | 142.3 | 1.00 | | Lc | 8 | 8.7 | 32.3 | 1.00 | Finding H5a [E honesty]: Towers do not form tight clusters about a single ground lattice seed (mean \(d\sim 9\)–\(24\) winding units). Not a K/K-style multiplet glued to one \((w_1,w_2)\). Finding H5b [E / weak M]: Excitation best-points are systematically closer to the heavy ground seed than to a light wrong seed (frac \(=1\) in tested families). That is largely a mass-neighbourhood / annulus effect (states near \(M_g\) sit near \(N\sim(M/M_{0C})^2\)), not proof of multiplet flavour inheritance on the lattice plane.

3. Integrity board

| Claim | Tag | |-------|-----| | Competitive lattice clouds large at heavy mass | [E] | | S0 best-err unique seed | [F as unique] for most grounds | | gcd=1 filter (light-like) changes seed vs S0 | [E process] | | S6 empty∩gcd1∩competitive package | [M selection package] | | S6 = multiplet theorem | [F if claimed] | | Excitation tower clusters on ground seed | [F / weak] | | Density caveat high N | [E] | | Free c,b,t on e_i | [CLOSED F] | | FL-HEAVY after H4/H5 | [O] selection package provisional; towers weak |

4. Verdict

1. H4 [E/M]: Selection is mandatory; S6 (empty ∩ gcd=1 ∩ competitive) is the best
provisional* package aligned with light priors. 2. H5 [E]: Excitation towers do not validate seeds as multiplet centres in \((w_1,w_2)\). 3. FL-HEAVY residual: still open — seeds without tower glue are incomplete membership. 4. Next: H6 multi-seat/binding geometry, or park until a tower-compatible invariant appears.
One-liner: Light-like gcd=1 selects cleaner empty lattice seeds for heavy hadrons, but PDG towers do not cluster on those seeds — membership package provisional, not closed.

Changelog

| Date | Change | |------|--------| | 2026-08-09 | FL-H4 selection rules + H5 tower clustering |